Studies and Reports - Spring 2017

May 10, 2017

 

Alternative Water Transfers in Colorado: A Review of Alternative Transfer Mechanisms for Front Range Municipalities

 

A recent report completed a financial comparison of the water supply development options currently pursued by Front Range municipalities, including new storage, buying agricultural water rights, purchasing ditch shares, groundwater wells, and also alternative transfer methods. 

Over an extended period of time, it is much more cost effective for the municipalities examined to secure water supplies through purchasing ditch shares for supply.  Purchasing agricultural water rights and leasing them back to agriculture was found to often be the most cost effective method.  Other alternative transfer methods like rotational fallowing were found to have a much higher costs for municipalities.

 

 

 

 

Grand Valley Water Users Association; Conserved Consumptive Use Pilot Project (CCUPP)

 

 

A report from the Grand Valley Water Users Association (GVWUA) examined the process and lessons learned from a “Water Bank” created and administered by the GVWUA.  For 2017, 10 voluntary irrigators in the Association will be paid to conserve consumptive use water.  A total of 1,252.2 acres will be involved in the program, and participants are being paid $356 to $623 per acre depending on the method of conserved consumptive use.  The report goes into detail about the issues of budget, timing, negative impacts, and marketing.  

 

You can read the entire report here.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Featured Posts

Colorado Cattlemen’s Ag Water NetWORK Provides Assistance to Ag Water Right Holders

May 11, 2017

1/1
Please reload

Recent Posts

July 25, 2019

December 18, 2018

July 31, 2018

April 30, 2018

Please reload

Archive
Please reload

© 2019 by Colorado Ag Water Alliance